Beauty King

Essentially the same setlist as last year's shows, in a different order. A few songs were swapped out, but the majority of the set was the exact same songs as last year. The staging is more elaborate, but honestly, not that much of an upgrade.
 
No new tracks.
 
No Coachella - Woodstock in My Mind.
 
The controversy is mostly over the fact that there were a lot of technical difficulties and she gave a somewhat weak performance overall.
 
It was not a great set, on the whole.

If Taylor $wift is the guest for week 2 i will throw TOMATOES at the TV screen. I do NOT want snore at the beach live. People had issues with Lana’s set at week 1. Why on earth would you want the biggest wet fart of a song ever for week 2? That wouldn’t help the problem. Also if Taylor is on stage you know damn well they’ll sing more than one song. Taylor has no business singing on and RUINING one of Lana’s songs, or vice versa Lana being forced to sing on one of Taylors songs . If i went to a Lana concert and had to sit through a Taylor $wift performance my entire year would be ruined…

My adoration for this woman, and how her music shaped me from 12 years old to 24, will not affect my assertion that that was a half-assed attempt at Lanachella 

Someone on PopJustice posted the album tracklist months ago, for those who are curious. This is before the addition of whatever the other re-recorded track is.
 
 

In short, no.

Someone on PopJustice posted the album tracklist months ago, for those who are curious. This is before the addition of whatever the other re-recorded track is.
 
 

Someone on PopJustice posted the album tracklist months ago, for those who are curious. This is before the addition of whatever the other re-recorded track is.
 
 

A person made an unreleased tracker yesterday that incorrectly listed those songs as leaked. They are not.

Nope, these were recorded from a Discord session where an insider was playing a bunch of random unreleased songs. There's a Bloom song, a couple demos, some scrapped tracks from the original second EP/album...it's a real melange, in those snippets.

The source was a pitching website where seemingly all uploads were censored, to make them more palatable to potential buyers.

https://guitargirlmag.com/news/music-news/cruel-youth-releases-devil-in-paradise/
 

We actually do know that Devil in Paradise was a pitched song initially, so that doesn't necessarily serve the point. She had written it for that Ronnie Spector EP that never ended up coming together.

The source was a pitching website where seemingly all uploads were censored, to make them more palatable to potential buyers.

The source was a pitching website where seemingly all uploads were censored, to make them more palatable to potential buyers.

The source was a pitching website where seemingly all uploads were censored, to make them more palatable to potential buyers.

The source was a pitching website where seemingly all uploads were censored, to make them more palatable to potential buyers.

He got busy with recording his own record and writing/producing for other people. They barely worked together after Paradise. She says he's still a good friend and that they just weren't wanting to make the same types of music at that time.
 
Whatever older thread you saw was probably a misinterpretation of her comments at the time; as far as we know, the early sessions for what became Ultraviolence were nearly all with Rick Nowels, not Emile.

He got busy with recording his own record and writing/producing for other people. They barely worked together after Paradise. She says he's still a good friend and that they just weren't wanting to make the same types of music at that time.
 
Whatever older thread you saw was probably a misinterpretation of her comments at the time; as far as we know, the early sessions for what became Ultraviolence were nearly all with Rick Nowels, not Emile.

There isn’t one. Her fanbase barely speaks between eras.

This is absolutely not how it works. She would have to negotiate the rights specifically when attempting to be released from her contract. Labels retain rights to all music produced under their auspices as a part of almost all recording contracts.
 
There's a significant chance she is leaving with almost none of the music produced in the last ten years.

This is absolutely not how it works. She would have to negotiate the rights specifically when attempting to be released from her contract. Labels retain rights to all music produced under their auspices as a part of almost all recording contracts.
 
There's a significant chance she is leaving with almost none of the music produced in the last ten years.

This is absolutely not how it works. She would have to negotiate the rights specifically when attempting to be released from her contract. Labels retain rights to all music produced under their auspices as a part of almost all recording contracts.
 
There's a significant chance she is leaving with almost none of the music produced in the last ten years.

This is absolutely not how it works. She would have to negotiate the rights specifically when attempting to be released from her contract. Labels retain rights to all music produced under their auspices as a part of almost all recording contracts.
 
There's a significant chance she is leaving with almost none of the music produced in the last ten years.

This is absolutely not how it works. She would have to negotiate the rights specifically when attempting to be released from her contract. Labels retain rights to all music produced under their auspices as a part of almost all recording contracts.
 
There's a significant chance she is leaving with almost none of the music produced in the last ten years.

This is absolutely not how it works. She would have to negotiate the rights specifically when attempting to be released from her contract. Labels retain rights to all music produced under their auspices as a part of almost all recording contracts.
 
There's a significant chance she is leaving with almost none of the music produced in the last ten years.