Grammy Awards 2024 - Lana Del Rey Nominated for 5 Awards

[gothphetamine 1,093]

16 minutes ago, Thats why they call me Dita said:

Lanaboards insta.. and I’m specifically talking about these 2 

Tbh her pupils could be from her meds. Mine permanently look like I’m on molly but it’s just cause of that

 

she looks so stunning 

[Thats why they call me Dita 9,765]

3 minutes ago, gothphetamine said:

Tbh her pupils could be from her meds. Mine permanently look like I’m on molly but it’s just cause of that

 

she looks so stunning 

True! Just saying I can see where the blind items may be coming from! 
 

she looks gorgeous as always ofc!

[Yameena Khatri 3,219]

Kinda pissed she didn't get to do any red carpet interviews 

[Genesee 6,336]

On 2/4/2024 at 10:24 PM, J.R.OMEGA said:

Joni finally getting her recognition at 80 is a glimpse into Lana's future. The industry will ignore her until the end.

days later this comment still haunts me   i'd like to think other big award shows have recognized and celebrated her (billboard, mtv, etc.), but the academy seems like it will never stop playing her. although she came out herself and said that she felt happy that night and it was a fun experience, i still can't help but feel disappointed and angry for her. how she has been fumbled eleven different times with them, and why i'm always hopeful they'll come around is something i'll never understand. 

[Make me your Dream Life 87,805]

ask not what the grammys can do for you, but rather, ask how long the people'll find them actually relevant 

[ArtDecoVintageGirl 623]

44 minutes ago, Make me your Dream Life said:

ask not what the grammys can do for you, but rather, ask how long the people'll find them actually relevant 

People don't even remember which bands / artists won Grammys. I discovered today that Queen never won a Grammy , same with The Doors and Guns n Roses.

Lana will always be relevant and have her fandom

[LifeOnMars 7,911]

Phoebe Bridgers said Lana deserved a Grammy in a recent interview with billboard . 
 

“Lana [Del Rey] should have won a long time ago,” she said. “Mitski should be acknowledged in any f–king way. There’s countless people. For [Portnow] to say that women aren’t working hard enough to get these awards is the stupidest s–t ever. I was like, ‘Why not say it here where everybody knows who this guy is?'”

[Pink Flamingo 17,145]

51 minutes ago, LifeOnMars said:

Phoebe Bridgers said Lana deserved a Grammy in a recent interview with billboard . 
 

“Lana [Del Rey] should have won a long time ago,” she said. “Mitski should be acknowledged in any f–king way. There’s countless people. For [Portnow] to say that women aren’t working hard enough to get these awards is the stupidest s–t ever. I was like, ‘Why not say it here where everybody knows who this guy is?'”

 

Everybody knows that except for the mfs who run the academy aka scammys

[marcodelrey 1,747]

53 minutes ago, LifeOnMars said:

Phoebe Bridgers said Lana deserved a Grammy in a recent interview with billboard . 
 

“Lana [Del Rey] should have won a long time ago,” she said. “Mitski should be acknowledged in any f–king way. There’s countless people. For [Portnow] to say that women aren’t working hard enough to get these awards is the stupidest s–t ever. I was like, ‘Why not say it here where everybody knows who this guy is?'”

Justice for NFR 

[bluechemtrails 26,735]

On 2/10/2024 at 6:04 AM, Make me your Dream Life said:

ask not what the grammys can do for you, but rather, ask how long the people'll find them actually relevant 

There's too much good music and artists for just one award per year (per category), and the choice of who gets the Grammys has often been questionable. It's similar to the Nobel Peace Prize or the Oscars.

[X8deletedUserX 4,711]

.

[Thats why they call me Dita 9,765]

Was listening to Arcadia earlier and it just hits home again- they built me up 300 feet tall, just to tear me down, so I’m leaving with nothing but laughter

 

its so true.. 2023 was her year, she was receiving all the praises in the world.. 5 nominations.. to not even receive an award in an alt category 

[Pink Flamingo 17,145]

I hate seeing the pictures of dykegenius holding their grammys, I like the record but... 

[blackenedrussianpoetry 2,439]

Was just doing fine then out of the blue i think how ocean blvd lost to “it’s me hi im the problem its me - sexy baby”… then get furious somehow… what’s up w taylor music really? The most vanilla of the vanilla… can only stand her presence when she’s w lana only im quite sorry

[Embach 42,387]

War flashbacks 

[Rorman Nockwell 56,710]

Lock this thread no one needs the truma

[honeymoon is alive 21,163]

just saw this on twitter (buzzingpop):

 

Recording Academy CEO Harvey Mason Jr. sent a letter urging the GRAMMYs’ 12,000 voting members to take their jobs seriously:

 

“The trajectory of people’s careers and lives are altered by your choices. As such, you owe it to your peers to vote intentionally, deliberately, with pride and with purpose. Last Grammy season, I heard a Grammy voter say they hadn’t taken a specific artist seriously since a performance they saw more than 10 years ago. I was shocked and disturbed by that. There is no place in our organization for such bias, grudge-holding, or careless voting. It’s about the current year and the quality of the work, period! There should be no other rationale for voting. If you are taking into account an artist’s older work, or their reputation, or race, or gender, what label they are on, who their manager is, how many friends participated in the project, or anything else like that, you’re not doing your job. I know most of you already do but please, just listen to the music, and evaluate it! You are the reason the Grammy Award is so special.”

[bluechemtrails 26,735]

24 minutes ago, honeymoon is alive said:

just saw this on twitter (buzzingpop):

 

Recording Academy CEO Harvey Mason Jr. sent a letter urging the GRAMMYs’ 12,000 voting members to take their jobs seriously:

 

“The trajectory of people’s careers and lives are altered by your choices. As such, you owe it to your peers to vote intentionally, deliberately, with pride and with purpose. Last Grammy season, I heard a Grammy voter say they hadn’t taken a specific artist seriously since a performance they saw more than 10 years ago. I was shocked and disturbed by that. There is no place in our organization for such bias, grudge-holding, or careless voting. It’s about the current year and the quality of the work, period! There should be no other rationale for voting. If you are taking into account an artist’s older work, or their reputation, or race, or gender, what label they are on, who their manager is, how many friends participated in the project, or anything else like that, you’re not doing your job. I know most of you already do but please, just listen to the music, and evaluate it! You are the reason the Grammy Award is so special.”

 

we all know who he's talking about

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/music-news/grammys-ceo-letter-members-vote-1235959091/

[honeymoon is alive 21,163]

9 minutes ago, grandpas glass said:

 

we all know who he's talking about

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/music-news/grammys-ceo-letter-members-vote-1235959091/

exactly! i’m glad they acknowledged this cause you can see it was 100% unfair 

[Embach 42,387]

I think that the music industry's biggest award's voters - Grammy's voters should be music experts from universities, not some random uncle Joes who mastered a Metallica album 30 years ago. These kind of fellas can vote for MTV or Billboard awards but not the Grammys.