seventies platinum

What if the titles track’s duration is 12:12  and instead of a a 7 minute guitar solo we get to hear 7 minutes of reverb-laced choking on vape liquid 

Wait.....I cracked the code
 
Today at 12 pm Cali time Lana makes an album announcement + reveals tracklist and cover + drops LMLYLAW as a single 
Then at midnight (12 am cali time)  she will drop the album 
 

this isn’t 2015 bb, lana is miles ahead of those other girls (although they are great, minus Diaper, who has lost her edge) 

That better not mean December 12th  

last im gonna say about this: some of y'all are just so brave on here it kinda astounds me lol. as a cis person you really don't get to come on here and tell people how to feel about issues regarding trans people. 
also the album is coming September 5 

sorry for beating a dead horse but lana is not transgender and she's not even lgbt and she really just isn't the person to speak about trans issues. having a persona that isn't true is different from singing about being a part of an oppressed group in society. thats like if she started singing about what its like to be black in america LMAO 

why is there talk about lana being trans or singing from a trans person's pov.. what are you guys on

you're VERY weird if you think it's appropriate for Lana, a cisgender straight woman, to sing about/from the perspective of trans women...

i made a joke about her having a girlfriend and then i left to eat dinner and came back to...this

where did this conversation even come from im so confused. 

this thread is a MESS. lana do something pls omfg. 

Y’all are DELUSIONAL, y’all know damn well that song is not about transgender

i think the issue here is that lana herself isn't trans and probably doesn't understands the struggles, she doesn't know what it's like to suffer from gender dysphoria, or fearing what others will think of you, and trying to transition successfully, if she wrote a song from the point of view of somebody transgender, it may come off as uneducated and inaccurate to the struggles they face, even if she has good intentions, it just wouldn't be the best look. 

I'm not interested in arguing with someone who is being as tone deaf as you are. This is an ongoing theme of yours, and I know how it's going to go. @irvnex has already outlined the problem with your views.
If you still don't get it, then I suggest you go away and educate yourself.

ANYWAYS..... 
does the discount on her Merch store mean a clearing out for new merchandise to come???

Now why are you trying to accuse me of something that doesn't even make sense? You're talking about something out ot place and disrespectful. You can't compare singing from the perspective of a middle-aged women to a trans woman? this is not even up for debate. Lana is not part of that community so she doesn't have the right to talk in their name and she wouldn't do something like that. You're creating a nonsense out of nowhere.

Why the frick are we arguing wether it’s appropriate for Lana to sing from the perspective of a transwoman? Why even bring that up? What does that analogy serve to prove?

i believe that lana felt the need to portray herself as a confident, strong, less submissive woman during the lfl and nfr era to appease others, she definitely played it safe. i think now, she's tired of putting on a facade for anyone's approval, this is very evident from her infamous letter, and even just from the tulsa jesus freak snippet, the lyrics are sultry and intriguing. even some of her more later works, transitioning into the lana we know now, are very "submissive" yet very powerful and beautiful, such as religion. the honeymoon album is definitely a classic ldr album, however you can tell she steps into her power more, but it doesn't feel forced. religion is such a great song that expresses the intense feelings she has for her lover, and i don't see it as "weak" or "toxic". i feel like lmlylaw could be similar, at the end of the day, i want lana to do what makes her happy and satisfied when it comes to her art, but she should never hold herself back for anyone's approval. 

Let Me Fuck You Like A Man would be an interesting concept for her

No... she can't do whatever she wants to. Those are totally different things. You can write fictional scenarios or use metaphors or exaggerations to tell a story, but she can't pretend to be part of an oppressed collective? That's literally very disrespectful and out of place.

lana came up in an age where the standard female pop star was a Boss Bitch™ Lady Gaga was the feminist gay icon, Beyonce was all about Girls Running the World, Nicki Minaj was a muthafuckin monster, etc. It was all about girl power and crazy fashion and not needing a man lol. 
 
Now then there's poor lil Lana who wears her heart on her sleeve, doesn't really have much media training, and writes songs about how much she loves/misses her boyfriend(s). She doesn't take much of a "stance" on things- she writes a song like Ultraviolence about abusive relationships, but rather than condemning them and writing some empowering anthem about leaving, she just kind of describes what it was like and leaves it at that. 
 
so people picked on her like crazy cause they didn't understand her (or pretended to not understand her) because she wasn't the cookie cutter girl power pop star they were used to. and of course, the cringey "SJW" culture that arose on the internet around this time didn't really work in her favor lol. so while other girls were "sex symbols" and "bad bitches" and "sexually liberated, empowered women"- lana got called a prostitute and a cokehead who slept around in hollywood and was a doormat to shitty men.
 
tbh it was really fucked up the way they all just ganged up on her, so no wonder she's so resentful of it now

errr-

wait is there really a theory that she's LMLYLAW will be about a trans person i'm so confused 

Oh yikes the delusions have turned to anger :/
 
We don’t even know the theme of the song we should know better than to judge a song by the title 

no, delusions have went from album the 5th to this...