Jump to content
Sitar

Random Lana Discussion Thread

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Mer said:

"πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ" πšπš›πš˜πš– πš–πš’ 𝟸0𝟷𝟺 πšŠπš•πš‹πšžπš– πš‘πšŠπšœ πšœπš™πšŠπš›πš”πšŽπš 𝚊 πšπš›πšŽπšŠπš πšπšŽπšŠπš• 𝚘𝚏 πšπšŽπš‹πšŠπšπšŽ πšŠπš—πš πšŒπš›πš’πšπš’πšŒπš’πšœπš– πš’πš— πš›πšŽπšŒπšŽπš—πš πš’πšŽπšŠπš›πšœ. π™ΌπšŠπš—πš’ πš™πšŽπš˜πš™πš•πšŽ πš‘πšŠπšŸπšŽ 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚍 πšπš‘πšŽ πšπš’πšπš•πšŽ πšπš›πšŠπšŒπš” 𝚘𝚏 πš›πš˜πš–πšŠπš—πšπš’πšŒπš’πš£πš’πš—πš πšŠπš‹πšžπšœπšŽ πšŠπš—πš πšπš˜πš‘πš’πšŒ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœπš‘πš’πš™πšœ. π™·πš˜πš πšŽπšŸπšŽπš›, 𝚊𝚜 𝚊 πš™πšŽπš›πšœπš˜πš— πš πš’πšπš‘ πšŒπš˜πš–πš–πš˜πš— πšœπšŽπš—πšœπšŽ, 𝙸 πšœπšπš›πš˜πš—πšπš•πš’ πšπš’πšœπšŠπšπš›πšŽπšŽ πš πš’πšπš‘ πšπš‘πšŽπšœπšŽ πšŠπšŒπšŒπšžπšœπšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœ πšŠπš—πš πš‹πšŽπš•πš’πšŽπšŸπšŽ πšπš‘πšŠπš 𝙸 πšŠπš– πš˜πš—πšŽ 𝚘𝚏 πšπš‘πšŽ πš–πš˜πšœπš πšπšŠπš•πšŽπš—πšπšŽπš πšŠπš—πš πš’πš—πšœπš’πšπš‘πšπšπšžπš• πšœπš˜πš—πšπš πš›πš’πšπšŽπš›πšœ 𝚘𝚏 πš˜πšžπš› πšπš’πš–πšŽ.
Β 
π™Έπš'𝚜 πšŽπšœπšœπšŽπš—πšπš’πšŠπš• 𝚝𝚘 πšžπš—πšπšŽπš›πšœπšπšŠπš—πš πšπš‘πšŽ πš‹πšŠπšŒπš”πšπš›πš˜πšžπš—πš πš‹πšŽπš‘πš’πš—πš "πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ." πšƒπš‘πšŽ πšœπš˜πš—πš πš’πšœ 𝚊 πš‹πšŠπš•πš•πšŠπš πšπš‘πšŠπš πšπšŽπš•πšŸπšŽπšœ πš’πš—πšπš˜ πšπš‘πšŽ πšπšŠπš›πš”πšŽπš› πšœπš’πšπšŽ 𝚘𝚏 πš•πš˜πšŸπšŽ πšŠπš—πš πšπšŽπšœπš’πš›πšŽ. π™Έπšπšœ πš•πš’πš›πš’πšŒπšœ πšπšŽπš™πš’πšŒπš 𝚊 πšπš˜πš‘πš’πšŒ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœπš‘πš’πš™, πš‹πšžπš πš’πš—πšœπšπšŽπšŠπš 𝚘𝚏 πšŒπšŽπš•πšŽπš‹πš›πšŠπšπš’πš—πš πš’πš, πšπš‘πšŽπš’ πšœπšŽπš›πšŸπšŽ 𝚊𝚜 𝚊 πšŒπšŠπšžπšπš’πš˜πš—πšŠπš›πš’ πšπšŠπš•πšŽ. πšƒπš‘πšŽπš’ πš‘πš’πšπš‘πš•πš’πšπš‘πš πšπš‘πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš–πš™πš•πšŽπš‘πš’πšπš’πšŽπšœ πšŠπš—πš πš™πšŠπš’πš— 𝚘𝚏 πš•πš˜πšŸπšŽ, πš πšŠπš›πš—πš’πš—πš πš•πš’πšœπšπšŽπš—πšŽπš›πšœ πšŠπš‹πš˜πšžπš πšπš‘πšŽ πš›πš’πšœπš”πšœ 𝚘𝚏 πšžπš—πš‘πšŽπšŠπš•πšπš‘πš’ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœπš‘πš’πš™πšœ. π™Ύπš—πšŽ 𝚘𝚏 πšπš‘πšŽ πš–πš˜πšœπš πš›πšŽπš–πšŠπš›πš”πšŠπš‹πš•πšŽ πšπš‘πš’πš—πšπšœ πšŠπš‹πš˜πšžπš "πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ" πš’πšœ πš’πšπšœ πš–πšžπšœπš’πšŒπšŠπš•πš’πšπš’. π™Όπš’ πš‘πšŠπšžπš—πšπš’πš—πš πšŸπš˜πš’πšŒπšŽ πšŠπš—πš πšŠπšπš–πš˜πšœπš™πš‘πšŽπš›πš’πšŒ πš™πš›πš˜πšπšžπšŒπšπš’πš˜πš— πšŒπš›πšŽπšŠπšπšŽ 𝚊 πšœπš™πšŽπš•πš•πš‹πš’πš—πšπš’πš—πš πš–πš˜πš˜πš πšπš‘πšŠπš'𝚜 πš‹πš˜πšπš‘ πšŒπšŠπš™πšπš’πšŸπšŠπšπš’πš—πš πšŠπš—πš πš˜πš–πš’πš—πš˜πšžπšœ. πšƒπš‘πšŽ πš–πšŽπš•πš˜πšπš’ πš’πšœ πšœπšπš›πšŠπš’πšπš‘πšπšπš˜πš›πš πšŠπš›πš πš‹πšžπš πš™πš˜πš πšŽπš›πšπšžπš•, πšπš›πšŠπš πš’πš—πš πšπš‘πšŽ πš•πš’πšœπšπšŽπš—πšŽπš› πš’πš— πšŠπš—πš πš‘πšŽπš’πšπš‘πšπšŽπš—πš’πš—πš πšπš‘πšŽ πšŽπš–πš˜πšπš’πš˜πš—πšŠπš• πš’πš–πš™πšŠπšŒπš 𝚘𝚏 πšπš‘πšŽ πš•πš’πš›πš’πšŒπšœ. πšƒπš‘πšŽ πš›πšŽπšœπšžπš•πš πš’πšœ 𝚊 πš–πšŽπšœπš–πšŽπš›πš’πš£πš’πš—πš πš•πš’πšœπšπšŽπš—πš’πš—πš πšŽπš‘πš™πšŽπš›πš’πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ πšπš‘πšŠπš'𝚜 πšžπš—πš’πššπšžπšŽ πš’πš— πšŒπš˜πš—πšπšŽπš–πš™πš˜πš›πšŠπš›πš’ πš–πšžπšœπš’πšŒ.
Β 
π™°πšπšπš’πšπš’πš˜πš—πšŠπš•πš•πš’, πš–πš’ πšœπš˜πš—πš πš πš›πš’πšπš’πš—πš πšœπš”πš’πš•πš•πšœ πšŠπš›πšŽ πš˜πš— πšπšžπš•πš• πšπš’πšœπš™πš•πšŠπš’ πš’πš— "πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ." My πš•πš’πš›πš’πšŒπšœ πšŠπš›πšŽ πšŒπšŠπš›πšŽπšπšžπš•πš•πš’ πšŒπš›πšŠπšπšπšŽπš 𝚝𝚘 πšŒπš˜πš—πšŸπšŽπš’ 𝚊 πšœπš™πšŽπšŒπš’πšπš’πšŒ πš–πšŽπšœπšœπšŠπšπšŽ, πšŠπš—πš πšπš‘πšŽπš’ 𝚜𝚞𝚌𝚌𝚎𝚎𝚍 πš’πš— πšπš˜πš’πš—πš 𝚜𝚘 πš’πš— 𝚊 𝚠𝚊𝚒 πšπš‘πšŠπš'𝚜 πš‹πš˜πšπš‘ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπšŠπš‹πš•πšŽ πšŠπš—πš πšžπš—πš’πšŸπšŽπš›πšœπšŠπš•. I πšœπš’πš—πšΒ πšŠπš‹πš˜πšžπš 𝚊 πšπš˜πš‘πš’πšŒ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœπš‘πš’πš™ πš πš’πšπš‘ πš›πšŠπš  πš‘πš˜πš—πšŽπšœπšπš’, πšŒπšŠπš™πšπšžπš›πš’πš—πš πšπš‘πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš—πšπšžπšœπš’πš˜πš— πšŠπš—πš πš™πšŠπš’πš— πšπš‘πšŠπš πš˜πšπšπšŽπš— πšŠπšŒπšŒπš˜πš–πš™πšŠπš—πš’ πšœπšžπšŒπš‘ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœπš‘πš’πš™πšœ.
Β 
π™Έπš'𝚜 πš πš˜πš›πšπš‘ πš–πšŽπš—πšπš’πš˜πš—πš’πš—πš πšπš‘πšŠπš πšπš‘πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš—πšπš›πš˜πšŸπšŽπš›πšœπš’ πšœπšžπš›πš›πš˜πšžπš—πšπš’πš—πš "πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ" πš’πšœ πš™πšŠπš›πš 𝚘𝚏 𝚊 πš‹πš›πš˜πšŠπšπšŽπš› πšŒπšžπš•πšπšžπš›πšŠπš• πšŒπš˜πš—πšŸπšŽπš›πšœπšŠπšπš’πš˜πš— πšŠπš‹πš˜πšžπš πšπš‘πšŽ πš›πš˜πš•πšŽ 𝚘𝚏 πš πš˜πš–πšŽπš— πš’πš— πš™πš˜πš™πšžπš•πšŠπš› πš–πšžπšœπš’πšŒ. πš‚πš˜πš–πšŽ πš™πšŽπš˜πš™πš•πšŽ πš‘πšŠπšŸπšŽ 𝚜𝚞𝚐𝚐𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚍 πšπš‘πšŠπš πš–πš’ πš’πš–πšŠπšπšŽ πšŠπš—πš πš–πšžπšœπš’πšŒ πšŠπš›πšŽ πš’πš—πšπšŽπš—πšπš’πš˜πš—πšŠπš•πš•πš’ πš™πš›πš˜πšŸπš˜πšŒπšŠπšπš’πšŸπšŽ, πšŠπš—πš πšπš‘πšŠπš πšπš‘πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš—πšπš›πš˜πšŸπšŽπš›πšœπš’ πšœπšžπš›πš›πš˜πšžπš—πšπš’πš—πš πš–πš’ πš πš˜πš›πš” πš’πšœ πšŠπš— πšŠπšπšπšŽπš–πš™πš 𝚝𝚘 πšœπš’πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ 𝚊 πšœπšπš›πš˜πš—πš πšπšŽπš–πšŠπš•πšŽ πšŸπš˜πš’πšŒπšŽ. πšƒπš‘πš’πšœ πš’πšœ 𝚊 πšπš•πšŠπš πšŽπš πš™πšŽπš›πšœπš™πšŽπšŒπšπš’πšŸπšŽ, πšŠπš—πš πš’πš πšπšŠπš’πš•πšœ 𝚝𝚘 πš›πšŽπšŒπš˜πšπš—πš’πš£πšŽ πšπš‘πšŽ πšŸπš’πšπšŠπš• πš–πšŽπšœπšœπšŠπšπšŽ πšπš‘πšŠπš 𝙸 πšŠπš– πšπš›πš’πš’πš—πš 𝚝𝚘 πšŒπš˜πš–πš–πšžπš—πš’πšŒπšŠπšπšŽ πšπš‘πš›πš˜πšžπšπš‘ my πš–πšžπšœπš’πšŒ.
Β 
π™Έπš— πšŒπš˜πš—πšŒπš•πšžπšœπš’πš˜πš—, "πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ" πš’πšœ 𝚊 πš™πš˜πš πšŽπš›πšπšžπš• πšŠπš—πš πšπš‘πš˜πšžπšπš‘πš-πš™πš›πš˜πšŸπš˜πš”πš’πš—πš πšœπš˜πš—πš πšπš‘πšŠπš πšπšŽπšœπšŽπš›πšŸπšŽπšœ 𝚝𝚘 πš‹πšŽ πš›πšŽπšŒπš˜πšπš—πš’πš£πšŽπš πšπš˜πš› πš’πšπšœ πš–πšžπšœπš’πšŒπšŠπš• πšŠπš—πš πš•πš’πš›πš’πšŒπšŠπš• πš‹πš›πš’πš•πš•πš’πšŠπš—πšŒπšŽ. πšƒπš‘πšŽ πšŠπš•πš•πšŽπšπšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœ πšπš‘πšŠπš πš’πš πš›πš˜πš–πšŠπš—πšπš’πšŒπš’πš£πšŽπšœ πšŠπš‹πšžπšœπšŽ πšŠπš—πš πšπš˜πš‘πš’πšŒ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœπš‘πš’πš™πšœ πšŠπš›πšŽ πš–πš’πšœπšπšžπš’πšπšŽπš, πšŠπš—πš πšπš‘πšŽπš’ πš˜πšŸπšŽπš›πš•πš˜πš˜πš” πšπš‘πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš—πšπšŽπš‘πš πšŠπš—πš πšœπš’πšπš—πš’πšπš’πšŒπšŠπš—πšŒπšŽ 𝚘𝚏 πšπš‘πšŽ πš•πš’πš›πš’πšŒπšœ. "πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ" πš’πšœ 𝚊 πšŒπš˜πš–πš–πšŽπš—πšπšŠπš›πš’ πš˜πš— πšπš‘πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš–πš™πš•πšŽπš‘πš’πšπš’πšŽπšœ πšŠπš—πš πšπšŠπš—πšπšŽπš›πšœ 𝚘𝚏 πš•πš˜πšŸπšŽ, πšŠπš—πš πš’πš πšœπš‘πš˜πš πšŒπšŠπšœπšŽπšœ πš–πš’ πšπšŠπš•πšŽπš—πšπšœ 𝚊𝚜 𝚊 πšœπš’πš—πšπšŽπš› πšŠπš—πš πšœπš˜πš—πšπš πš›πš’πšπšŽπš›.

Β 

π™Όπš’ 𝟷0πšπš‘ πšœπšπšžπšπš’πš˜ πšŠπš•πš‹πšžπš–, πšπš’πšπš•πšŽπš "πšƒπš‘πšŽ π™Ύπš•πš’πšŸπšŽ π™ΆπšŠπš›πšπšŽπš— πš™πšŠπš›πš”πš’πš—πš πš•πš˜πš πš’πšœ πš πš‘πšŽπš›πšŽ 𝙸 πšŒπš˜πš–πš–πš’πšπšπšŽπš πšŠπš›πšœπš˜πš—" πš πš’πš•πš• πš‹πšŽ 𝚘𝚞𝚝 π™°πšžπšπšžπšœπš πŸ·πŸΏπšπš‘.

i didn’t realize there was a typewriter font on here… oh i am about to abuse this so much

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mer said:

"πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ" πšπš›πš˜πš– πš–πš’ 𝟸0𝟷𝟺 πšŠπš•πš‹πšžπš– πš‘πšŠπšœ πšœπš™πšŠπš›πš”πšŽπš 𝚊 πšπš›πšŽπšŠπš πšπšŽπšŠπš• 𝚘𝚏 πšπšŽπš‹πšŠπšπšŽ πšŠπš—πš πšŒπš›πš’πšπš’πšŒπš’πšœπš– πš’πš— πš›πšŽπšŒπšŽπš—πš πš’πšŽπšŠπš›πšœ. π™ΌπšŠπš—πš’ πš™πšŽπš˜πš™πš•πšŽ πš‘πšŠπšŸπšŽ 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚍 πšπš‘πšŽ πšπš’πšπš•πšŽ πšπš›πšŠπšŒπš” 𝚘𝚏 πš›πš˜πš–πšŠπš—πšπš’πšŒπš’πš£πš’πš—πš πšŠπš‹πšžπšœπšŽ πšŠπš—πš πšπš˜πš‘πš’πšŒ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœπš‘πš’πš™πšœ. π™·πš˜πš πšŽπšŸπšŽπš›, 𝚊𝚜 𝚊 πš™πšŽπš›πšœπš˜πš— πš πš’πšπš‘ πšŒπš˜πš–πš–πš˜πš— πšœπšŽπš—πšœπšŽ, 𝙸 πšœπšπš›πš˜πš—πšπš•πš’ πšπš’πšœπšŠπšπš›πšŽπšŽ πš πš’πšπš‘ πšπš‘πšŽπšœπšŽ πšŠπšŒπšŒπšžπšœπšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœ πšŠπš—πš πš‹πšŽπš•πš’πšŽπšŸπšŽ πšπš‘πšŠπš 𝙸 πšŠπš– πš˜πš—πšŽ 𝚘𝚏 πšπš‘πšŽ πš–πš˜πšœπš πšπšŠπš•πšŽπš—πšπšŽπš πšŠπš—πš πš’πš—πšœπš’πšπš‘πšπšπšžπš• πšœπš˜πš—πšπš πš›πš’πšπšŽπš›πšœ 𝚘𝚏 πš˜πšžπš› πšπš’πš–πšŽ.
Β 
π™Έπš'𝚜 πšŽπšœπšœπšŽπš—πšπš’πšŠπš• 𝚝𝚘 πšžπš—πšπšŽπš›πšœπšπšŠπš—πš πšπš‘πšŽ πš‹πšŠπšŒπš”πšπš›πš˜πšžπš—πš πš‹πšŽπš‘πš’πš—πš "πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ." πšƒπš‘πšŽ πšœπš˜πš—πš πš’πšœ 𝚊 πš‹πšŠπš•πš•πšŠπš πšπš‘πšŠπš πšπšŽπš•πšŸπšŽπšœ πš’πš—πšπš˜ πšπš‘πšŽ πšπšŠπš›πš”πšŽπš› πšœπš’πšπšŽ 𝚘𝚏 πš•πš˜πšŸπšŽ πšŠπš—πš πšπšŽπšœπš’πš›πšŽ. π™Έπšπšœ πš•πš’πš›πš’πšŒπšœ πšπšŽπš™πš’πšŒπš 𝚊 πšπš˜πš‘πš’πšŒ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœπš‘πš’πš™, πš‹πšžπš πš’πš—πšœπšπšŽπšŠπš 𝚘𝚏 πšŒπšŽπš•πšŽπš‹πš›πšŠπšπš’πš—πš πš’πš, πšπš‘πšŽπš’ πšœπšŽπš›πšŸπšŽ 𝚊𝚜 𝚊 πšŒπšŠπšžπšπš’πš˜πš—πšŠπš›πš’ πšπšŠπš•πšŽ. πšƒπš‘πšŽπš’ πš‘πš’πšπš‘πš•πš’πšπš‘πš πšπš‘πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš–πš™πš•πšŽπš‘πš’πšπš’πšŽπšœ πšŠπš—πš πš™πšŠπš’πš— 𝚘𝚏 πš•πš˜πšŸπšŽ, πš πšŠπš›πš—πš’πš—πš πš•πš’πšœπšπšŽπš—πšŽπš›πšœ πšŠπš‹πš˜πšžπš πšπš‘πšŽ πš›πš’πšœπš”πšœ 𝚘𝚏 πšžπš—πš‘πšŽπšŠπš•πšπš‘πš’ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœπš‘πš’πš™πšœ. π™Ύπš—πšŽ 𝚘𝚏 πšπš‘πšŽ πš–πš˜πšœπš πš›πšŽπš–πšŠπš›πš”πšŠπš‹πš•πšŽ πšπš‘πš’πš—πšπšœ πšŠπš‹πš˜πšžπš "πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ" πš’πšœ πš’πšπšœ πš–πšžπšœπš’πšŒπšŠπš•πš’πšπš’. π™Όπš’ πš‘πšŠπšžπš—πšπš’πš—πš πšŸπš˜πš’πšŒπšŽ πšŠπš—πš πšŠπšπš–πš˜πšœπš™πš‘πšŽπš›πš’πšŒ πš™πš›πš˜πšπšžπšŒπšπš’πš˜πš— πšŒπš›πšŽπšŠπšπšŽ 𝚊 πšœπš™πšŽπš•πš•πš‹πš’πš—πšπš’πš—πš πš–πš˜πš˜πš πšπš‘πšŠπš'𝚜 πš‹πš˜πšπš‘ πšŒπšŠπš™πšπš’πšŸπšŠπšπš’πš—πš πšŠπš—πš πš˜πš–πš’πš—πš˜πšžπšœ. πšƒπš‘πšŽ πš–πšŽπš•πš˜πšπš’ πš’πšœ πšœπšπš›πšŠπš’πšπš‘πšπšπš˜πš›πš πšŠπš›πš πš‹πšžπš πš™πš˜πš πšŽπš›πšπšžπš•, πšπš›πšŠπš πš’πš—πš πšπš‘πšŽ πš•πš’πšœπšπšŽπš—πšŽπš› πš’πš— πšŠπš—πš πš‘πšŽπš’πšπš‘πšπšŽπš—πš’πš—πš πšπš‘πšŽ πšŽπš–πš˜πšπš’πš˜πš—πšŠπš• πš’πš–πš™πšŠπšŒπš 𝚘𝚏 πšπš‘πšŽ πš•πš’πš›πš’πšŒπšœ. πšƒπš‘πšŽ πš›πšŽπšœπšžπš•πš πš’πšœ 𝚊 πš–πšŽπšœπš–πšŽπš›πš’πš£πš’πš—πš πš•πš’πšœπšπšŽπš—πš’πš—πš πšŽπš‘πš™πšŽπš›πš’πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ πšπš‘πšŠπš'𝚜 πšžπš—πš’πššπšžπšŽ πš’πš— πšŒπš˜πš—πšπšŽπš–πš™πš˜πš›πšŠπš›πš’ πš–πšžπšœπš’πšŒ.
Β 
π™°πšπšπš’πšπš’πš˜πš—πšŠπš•πš•πš’, πš–πš’ πšœπš˜πš—πš πš πš›πš’πšπš’πš—πš πšœπš”πš’πš•πš•πšœ πšŠπš›πšŽ πš˜πš— πšπšžπš•πš• πšπš’πšœπš™πš•πšŠπš’ πš’πš— "πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ." My πš•πš’πš›πš’πšŒπšœ πšŠπš›πšŽ πšŒπšŠπš›πšŽπšπšžπš•πš•πš’ πšŒπš›πšŠπšπšπšŽπš 𝚝𝚘 πšŒπš˜πš—πšŸπšŽπš’ 𝚊 πšœπš™πšŽπšŒπš’πšπš’πšŒ πš–πšŽπšœπšœπšŠπšπšŽ, πšŠπš—πš πšπš‘πšŽπš’ 𝚜𝚞𝚌𝚌𝚎𝚎𝚍 πš’πš— πšπš˜πš’πš—πš 𝚜𝚘 πš’πš— 𝚊 𝚠𝚊𝚒 πšπš‘πšŠπš'𝚜 πš‹πš˜πšπš‘ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπšŠπš‹πš•πšŽ πšŠπš—πš πšžπš—πš’πšŸπšŽπš›πšœπšŠπš•. I πšœπš’πš—πšΒ πšŠπš‹πš˜πšžπš 𝚊 πšπš˜πš‘πš’πšŒ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœπš‘πš’πš™ πš πš’πšπš‘ πš›πšŠπš  πš‘πš˜πš—πšŽπšœπšπš’, πšŒπšŠπš™πšπšžπš›πš’πš—πš πšπš‘πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš—πšπšžπšœπš’πš˜πš— πšŠπš—πš πš™πšŠπš’πš— πšπš‘πšŠπš πš˜πšπšπšŽπš— πšŠπšŒπšŒπš˜πš–πš™πšŠπš—πš’ πšœπšžπšŒπš‘ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœπš‘πš’πš™πšœ.
Β 
π™Έπš'𝚜 πš πš˜πš›πšπš‘ πš–πšŽπš—πšπš’πš˜πš—πš’πš—πš πšπš‘πšŠπš πšπš‘πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš—πšπš›πš˜πšŸπšŽπš›πšœπš’ πšœπšžπš›πš›πš˜πšžπš—πšπš’πš—πš "πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ" πš’πšœ πš™πšŠπš›πš 𝚘𝚏 𝚊 πš‹πš›πš˜πšŠπšπšŽπš› πšŒπšžπš•πšπšžπš›πšŠπš• πšŒπš˜πš—πšŸπšŽπš›πšœπšŠπšπš’πš˜πš— πšŠπš‹πš˜πšžπš πšπš‘πšŽ πš›πš˜πš•πšŽ 𝚘𝚏 πš πš˜πš–πšŽπš— πš’πš— πš™πš˜πš™πšžπš•πšŠπš› πš–πšžπšœπš’πšŒ. πš‚πš˜πš–πšŽ πš™πšŽπš˜πš™πš•πšŽ πš‘πšŠπšŸπšŽ 𝚜𝚞𝚐𝚐𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚍 πšπš‘πšŠπš πš–πš’ πš’πš–πšŠπšπšŽ πšŠπš—πš πš–πšžπšœπš’πšŒ πšŠπš›πšŽ πš’πš—πšπšŽπš—πšπš’πš˜πš—πšŠπš•πš•πš’ πš™πš›πš˜πšŸπš˜πšŒπšŠπšπš’πšŸπšŽ, πšŠπš—πš πšπš‘πšŠπš πšπš‘πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš—πšπš›πš˜πšŸπšŽπš›πšœπš’ πšœπšžπš›πš›πš˜πšžπš—πšπš’πš—πš πš–πš’ πš πš˜πš›πš” πš’πšœ πšŠπš— πšŠπšπšπšŽπš–πš™πš 𝚝𝚘 πšœπš’πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ 𝚊 πšœπšπš›πš˜πš—πš πšπšŽπš–πšŠπš•πšŽ πšŸπš˜πš’πšŒπšŽ. πšƒπš‘πš’πšœ πš’πšœ 𝚊 πšπš•πšŠπš πšŽπš πš™πšŽπš›πšœπš™πšŽπšŒπšπš’πšŸπšŽ, πšŠπš—πš πš’πš πšπšŠπš’πš•πšœ 𝚝𝚘 πš›πšŽπšŒπš˜πšπš—πš’πš£πšŽ πšπš‘πšŽ πšŸπš’πšπšŠπš• πš–πšŽπšœπšœπšŠπšπšŽ πšπš‘πšŠπš 𝙸 πšŠπš– πšπš›πš’πš’πš—πš 𝚝𝚘 πšŒπš˜πš–πš–πšžπš—πš’πšŒπšŠπšπšŽ πšπš‘πš›πš˜πšžπšπš‘ my πš–πšžπšœπš’πšŒ.
Β 
π™Έπš— πšŒπš˜πš—πšŒπš•πšžπšœπš’πš˜πš—, "πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ" πš’πšœ 𝚊 πš™πš˜πš πšŽπš›πšπšžπš• πšŠπš—πš πšπš‘πš˜πšžπšπš‘πš-πš™πš›πš˜πšŸπš˜πš”πš’πš—πš πšœπš˜πš—πš πšπš‘πšŠπš πšπšŽπšœπšŽπš›πšŸπšŽπšœ 𝚝𝚘 πš‹πšŽ πš›πšŽπšŒπš˜πšπš—πš’πš£πšŽπš πšπš˜πš› πš’πšπšœ πš–πšžπšœπš’πšŒπšŠπš• πšŠπš—πš πš•πš’πš›πš’πšŒπšŠπš• πš‹πš›πš’πš•πš•πš’πšŠπš—πšŒπšŽ. πšƒπš‘πšŽ πšŠπš•πš•πšŽπšπšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœ πšπš‘πšŠπš πš’πš πš›πš˜πš–πšŠπš—πšπš’πšŒπš’πš£πšŽπšœ πšŠπš‹πšžπšœπšŽ πšŠπš—πš πšπš˜πš‘πš’πšŒ πš›πšŽπš•πšŠπšπš’πš˜πš—πšœπš‘πš’πš™πšœ πšŠπš›πšŽ πš–πš’πšœπšπšžπš’πšπšŽπš, πšŠπš—πš πšπš‘πšŽπš’ πš˜πšŸπšŽπš›πš•πš˜πš˜πš” πšπš‘πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš—πšπšŽπš‘πš πšŠπš—πš πšœπš’πšπš—πš’πšπš’πšŒπšŠπš—πšŒπšŽ 𝚘𝚏 πšπš‘πšŽ πš•πš’πš›πš’πšŒπšœ. "πš„πš•πšπš›πšŠπšŸπš’πš˜πš•πšŽπš—πšŒπšŽ" πš’πšœ 𝚊 πšŒπš˜πš–πš–πšŽπš—πšπšŠπš›πš’ πš˜πš— πšπš‘πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš–πš™πš•πšŽπš‘πš’πšπš’πšŽπšœ πšŠπš—πš πšπšŠπš—πšπšŽπš›πšœ 𝚘𝚏 πš•πš˜πšŸπšŽ, πšŠπš—πš πš’πš πšœπš‘πš˜πš πšŒπšŠπšœπšŽπšœ πš–πš’ πšπšŠπš•πšŽπš—πšπšœ 𝚊𝚜 𝚊 πšœπš’πš—πšπšŽπš› πšŠπš—πš πšœπš˜πš—πšπš πš›πš’πšπšŽπš›.

Β 

π™Όπš’ 𝟷0πšπš‘ πšœπšπšžπšπš’πš˜ πšŠπš•πš‹πšžπš–, πšπš’πšπš•πšŽπš "πšƒπš‘πšŽ π™Ύπš•πš’πšŸπšŽ π™ΆπšŠπš›πšπšŽπš— πš™πšŠπš›πš”πš’πš—πš πš•πš˜πš πš’πšœ πš πš‘πšŽπš›πšŽ 𝙸 πšŒπš˜πš–πš–πš’πšπšπšŽπš πšŠπš›πšœπš˜πš—" πš πš’πš•πš• πš‹πšŽ 𝚘𝚞𝚝 π™°πšžπšπšžπšœπš πŸ·πŸΏπšπš‘.

:thumb2:

Β 

okay yall lets not poke fun at the OP :thumb3:


Last.FMΒ |Β DiscogsΒ |Β JOYRIDE

qVUNz3j.png

Β 

Β 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm an english graduate so imma give you a few pointers on academic writing (i can't sleep and got nothing better to do)

i'm writing this to genuinely help you with your course, not to make fun of you or anything

58 minutes ago, hehitmeanditfeltlikeakis said:

Β Many people have accused the title track

who? name a media outlet or a critic who has accused the title track; if your essay is based on opposing these allegations, you must be more clear on who has made these allegations and for which reason. "many people" doesn't tell the reader anything. you need specific examples (which is the reoccurring issue in the essay)

1 hour ago, hehitmeanditfeltlikeakis said:

However, as a music critic and a person with common sense

absolutely not. your argument in an essay cannot be that you have common sense. delete. your viewpoint needs to be supported by factual arguments and evidence, it can't be "just trust me bro"

1 hour ago, hehitmeanditfeltlikeakis said:

It's essential to understand the background behind "Ultraviolence."

i love how you say this and then proceed to provide no background for the song at all:air2: the background would provide us with info about the era of her career and the topics she dealt with at that time of the song release, other related media such as the song's music video and other songs from the album and her opus that are correlated to lana's songwriting in Ultraviolence, and then more specific who is she singing about in the song etc.

1 hour ago, hehitmeanditfeltlikeakis said:

Β Its lyrics depict a toxic relationship, but instead of celebrating it, they serve as a cautionary tale. They highlight the complexities and pain of love, warning listeners about the risks of unhealthy relationships.

you cannot analyze a lyrics and not provide any examples. You should have copied a few lines and said "in this line it's evident that she' talking about this and that." you need to imagine that this is going to be read by someone who never heard the song so all this would mean nothing to an average reader (and that's one of the important aspects of academic writing when it comes to topics like this - you always have to assume the reader does not know anything about the matter, in other words, you need to spell everything out and be as specific as possible) . For example, Lana Del Rey opens the song by saying that her lover used to call her a deadly nightshade. This implies this and that (and in this part you argue how this line supports you view)... I know this sound very dumbed-down, but this is an academic way of presenting information. evidence (example) spelled out + analysis

the part with "they serve as a cautionary tale" is very interesting and i wish you actually showed us how exactly and in which lines is the song a cautionary tale. that would have been an amazing argument, i love the expression cautionary tale, great job with that

1 hour ago, hehitmeanditfeltlikeakis said:

Β Her lyrics are carefully crafted to convey a specific message

Β 

the vital message that Lana is trying to communicate through her music.

Β 

girl what is the message? you mention it twice and you're defending the message without even telling us what is the message of the song :air2:

Β 

1 hour ago, hehitmeanditfeltlikeakis said:

Β The allegations that it romanticizes abuse and toxic relationships are misguided, and they overlook the context and significance of the lyrics

you could have gone so much deeper into explaining how does the song not romanticize abuse and toxic relationships. even to me it's unclear how exactly how argued that it does not. because you basically expressed you general opinion and the feeling you get when you listen to the song, but you didn't make any strong arguments. in which part of the song or in which line can we see that Lana's not romanticizing abuse? How can you prove that she's singing from a perspective of someone who's aware of the danger of toxic love and not from the perspective of someone who's lost in it or enjoying it?

1 hour ago, hehitmeanditfeltlikeakis said:

Β and it showcases Lana's talents as a singer and songwriter.

no shade to lana, but how? again, you need to prove this. how does the lyrical style show her talent? what lyrical devices did she use? what words or lines can be felt strongly by the listener and why? what about storytelling?

Β 

in conclusion, you have a great way with words and it all looks nice. I have zero notes for the language and writing style, A+Β  for that. however, the content is an issue. you need to be so much more specific. provide examples, have clear arguments, go into depth and take us there. your essay is very very general, very subjective, and it doesn't say too much of something specific and it doesn't really help the reader learn something new or make him/her think about the topic


giphy.gif

Β *:ο½₯゚✧*:ο½₯οΎŸβœ§βœΏβ˜†π¦π² 𝐠𝐨𝐨𝐟𝐒𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐒𝐬 𝐦𝐲 π©π¨πžπ­π«π²β˜†βœΏβœ§ο½₯゚: *✧ο½₯゚:*

Β *:ο½₯゚✧*:ο½₯οΎŸβœ§βœΏβ˜†π¦π² 𝐬𝐒π₯π₯𝐒𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐒𝐬 𝐦𝐲 π₯πžπ πšπœπ²β˜†βœΏβœ§ο½₯゚: *✧ο½₯゚:*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, kraljicabenzinske said:

i'm an english graduate so imma give you a few pointers on academic writing (i can't sleep and got nothing better to do)

i'm writing this to genuinely help you with your course, not to make fun of you or anything

who? name a media outlet or a critic who has accused the title track; if your essay is based on opposing these allegations, you must be more clear on who has made these allegations and for which reason. "many people" doesn't tell the reader anything. you need specific examples (which is the reoccurring issue in the essay)

absolutely not. your argument in an essay cannot be that you have common sense. delete. your viewpoint needs to be supported by factual arguments and evidence, it can't be "just trust me bro"

i love how you say this and then proceed to provide no background for the song at all:air2: the background would provide us with info about the era of her career and the topics she dealt with at that time of the song release, other related media such as the song's music video and other songs from the album and her opus that are correlated to lana's songwriting in Ultraviolence, and then more specific who is she singing about in the song etc.

you cannot analyze a lyrics and not provide any examples. You should have copied a few lines and said "in this line it's evident that she' talking about this and that." you need to imagine that this is going to be read by someone who never heard the song so all this would mean nothing to an average reader (and that's one of the important aspects of academic writing when it comes to topics like this - you always have to assume the reader does not know anything about the matter, in other words, you need to spell everything out and be as specific as possible) . For example, Lana Del Rey opens the song by saying that her lover used to call her a deadly nightshade. This implies this and that (and in this part you argue how this line supports you view)... I know this sound very dumbed-down, but this is an academic way of presenting information. evidence (example) spelled out + analysis

the part with "they serve as a cautionary tale" is very interesting and i wish you actually showed us how exactly and in which lines is the song a cautionary tale. that would have been an amazing argument, i love the expression cautionary tale, great job with that

girl what is the message? you mention it twice and you're defending the message without even telling us what is the message of the song :air2:

Β 

you could have gone so much deeper into explaining how does the song not romanticize abuse and toxic relationships. even to me it's unclear how exactly how argued that it does not. because you basically expressed you general opinion and the feeling you get when you listen to the song, but you didn't make any strong arguments. in which part of the song or in which line can we see that Lana's not romanticizing abuse? How can you prove that she's singing from a perspective of someone who's aware of the danger of toxic love and not from the perspective of someone who's lost in it or enjoying it?

no shade to lana, but how? again, you need to prove this. how does the lyrical style show her talent? what lyrical devices did she use? what words or lines can be felt strongly by the listener and why? what about storytelling?

Β 

in conclusion, you have a great way with words and it all looks nice. I have zero notes for the language and writing style, A+Β  for that. however, the content is an issue. you need to be so much more specific. provide examples, have clear arguments, go into depth and take us there. your essay is very very general, very subjective, and it doesn't say too much of something specific and it doesn't really help the reader learn something new or make him/her think about the topic

Oh you’re sick. I’m actually laughing y’all are so mean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, anwdelrey said:

Oh you’re sick. I’m actually laughing y’all are so mean.

no but i'm genuinely trying to help and give him advice on how to improve the article from academic point of viewΒ :crai: i've been doing academic writing for 5 years now and that's how I'd improve it based on my experience and knowledge

Β 


giphy.gif

Β *:ο½₯゚✧*:ο½₯οΎŸβœ§βœΏβ˜†π¦π² 𝐠𝐨𝐨𝐟𝐒𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐒𝐬 𝐦𝐲 π©π¨πžπ­π«π²β˜†βœΏβœ§ο½₯゚: *✧ο½₯゚:*

Β *:ο½₯゚✧*:ο½₯οΎŸβœ§βœΏβ˜†π¦π² 𝐬𝐒π₯π₯𝐒𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐒𝐬 𝐦𝐲 π₯πžπ πšπœπ²β˜†βœΏβœ§ο½₯゚: *✧ο½₯゚:*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, kraljicabenzinske said:

i'm an english graduate so imma give you a few pointers on academic writing (i can't sleep and got nothing better to do)

i'm writing this to genuinely help you with your course, not to make fun of you or anything

who? name a media outlet or a critic who has accused the title track; if your essay is based on opposing these allegations, you must be more clear on who has made these allegations and for which reason. "many people" doesn't tell the reader anything. you need specific examples (which is the reoccurring issue in the essay)

absolutely not. your argument in an essay cannot be that you have common sense. delete. your viewpoint needs to be supported by factual arguments and evidence, it can't be "just trust me bro"

i love how you say this and then proceed to provide no background for the song at all:air2: the background would provide us with info about the era of her career and the topics she dealt with at that time of the song release, other related media such as the song's music video and other songs from the album and her opus that are correlated to lana's songwriting in Ultraviolence, and then more specific who is she singing about in the song etc.

you cannot analyze a lyrics and not provide any examples. You should have copied a few lines and said "in this line it's evident that she' talking about this and that." you need to imagine that this is going to be read by someone who never heard the song so all this would mean nothing to an average reader (and that's one of the important aspects of academic writing when it comes to topics like this - you always have to assume the reader does not know anything about the matter, in other words, you need to spell everything out and be as specific as possible) . For example, Lana Del Rey opens the song by saying that her lover used to call her a deadly nightshade. This implies this and that (and in this part you argue how this line supports you view)... I know this sound very dumbed-down, but this is an academic way of presenting information. evidence (example) spelled out + analysis

the part with "they serve as a cautionary tale" is very interesting and i wish you actually showed us how exactly and in which lines is the song a cautionary tale. that would have been an amazing argument, i love the expression cautionary tale, great job with that

girl what is the message? you mention it twice and you're defending the message without even telling us what is the message of the song :air2:

Β 

you could have gone so much deeper into explaining how does the song not romanticize abuse and toxic relationships. even to me it's unclear how exactly how argued that it does not. because you basically expressed you general opinion and the feeling you get when you listen to the song, but you didn't make any strong arguments. in which part of the song or in which line can we see that Lana's not romanticizing abuse? How can you prove that she's singing from a perspective of someone who's aware of the danger of toxic love and not from the perspective of someone who's lost in it or enjoying it?

no shade to lana, but how? again, you need to prove this. how does the lyrical style show her talent? what lyrical devices did she use? what words or lines can be felt strongly by the listener and why? what about storytelling?

Β 

in conclusion, you have a great way with words and it all looks nice. I have zero notes for the language and writing style, A+Β  for that. however, the content is an issue. you need to be so much more specific. provide examples, have clear arguments, go into depth and take us there. your essay is very very general, very subjective, and it doesn't say too much of something specific and it doesn't really help the reader learn something new or make him/her think about the topic

IM ROTF 😭😭😭😭😭

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we’re on page 666… :excited::godlaugh:


giphy.gif

Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  "π’Ήπ‘œπ“ƒπ“‰ π’»π‘œπ“‡π‘”π‘’π“‰ 𝓂𝑒, 𝓁𝒾𝓀𝑒 𝓉𝒽𝑒 π“‰π“Šπ“ƒπ“ƒπ‘’π“ π“Šπ“ƒπ’Ήπ‘’π“‡ π‘œπ’Έπ‘’π’Άπ“ƒ 𝒷𝓁𝓋𝒹"

Β  Β instagram

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, kraljicabenzinske said:

no but i'm genuinely trying to help and give him advice on how to improve the article from academic point of viewΒ :crai: i've been doing academic writing for 5 years now and that's how I'd improve it based on my experience and knowledge

Β 


honestly I didn’t major in English but everything you said was on point. That’s why I asked if it was for a college course. It didn’t go deep enough in itsΒ analysis. Also the thesis was weak in my opinion. The intro β€œparagraph” did not make the crux of the argument explicitly clear and detailed, which is why the body also suffered from vagueness.Β 


⊹ (:Μ²Μ…:Μ²Μ…:Μ²Μ…[Μ²Μ…:β™‘:]Μ²Μ…:Μ²Μ…:Μ²Μ…:Μ²Μ…) ⊹ 

π“Š”Β I took the miracle move on drugΒ π“Š”

βš•οΈΒ The effects were temporaryΒ βš•οΈ

⊹ (:Μ²Μ…:Μ²Μ…:Μ²Μ…[Μ²Μ…:β™‘:]Μ²Μ…:Μ²Μ…:Μ²Μ…:Μ²Μ…) ⊹ 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, terrencelovesy0u said:

we’re on page 666… :excited::godlaugh:

Β 

It's time to summon Asmodeous.Β 


Now that Doja Cat, Ariana, Camila, Cardi B, Kehlani and Nicki Minaj and Beyonce have had number ones with songs about being sexy, wearing no clothes, fucking, cheating etc - can I please go back to singing about being embodied, feeling beautiful by being in love even if the relationship is not perfect, or dancing for money - or whatever I want - without being crucified or saying I'm glamorizing abuse??????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, kraljicabenzinske said:

i'm an english graduate so imma give you a few pointers on academic writing (i can't sleep and got nothing better to do)

i'm writing this to genuinely help you with your course, not to make fun of you or anything

who? name a media outlet or a critic who has accused the title track; if your essay is based on opposing these allegations, you must be more clear on who has made these allegations and for which reason. "many people" doesn't tell the reader anything. you need specific examples (which is the reoccurring issue in the essay)

absolutely not. your argument in an essay cannot be that you have common sense. delete. your viewpoint needs to be supported by factual arguments and evidence, it can't be "just trust me bro"

i love how you say this and then proceed to provide no background for the song at all:air2: the background would provide us with info about the era of her career and the topics she dealt with at that time of the song release, other related media such as the song's music video and other songs from the album and her opus that are correlated to lana's songwriting in Ultraviolence, and then more specific who is she singing about in the song etc.

you cannot analyze a lyrics and not provide any examples. You should have copied a few lines and said "in this line it's evident that she' talking about this and that." you need to imagine that this is going to be read by someone who never heard the song so all this would mean nothing to an average reader (and that's one of the important aspects of academic writing when it comes to topics like this - you always have to assume the reader does not know anything about the matter, in other words, you need to spell everything out and be as specific as possible) . For example, Lana Del Rey opens the song by saying that her lover used to call her a deadly nightshade. This implies this and that (and in this part you argue how this line supports you view)... I know this sound very dumbed-down, but this is an academic way of presenting information. evidence (example) spelled out + analysis

the part with "they serve as a cautionary tale" is very interesting and i wish you actually showed us how exactly and in which lines is the song a cautionary tale. that would have been an amazing argument, i love the expression cautionary tale, great job with that

girl what is the message? you mention it twice and you're defending the message without even telling us what is the message of the song :air2:

Β 

you could have gone so much deeper into explaining how does the song not romanticize abuse and toxic relationships. even to me it's unclear how exactly how argued that it does not. because you basically expressed you general opinion and the feeling you get when you listen to the song, but you didn't make any strong arguments. in which part of the song or in which line can we see that Lana's not romanticizing abuse? How can you prove that she's singing from a perspective of someone who's aware of the danger of toxic love and not from the perspective of someone who's lost in it or enjoying it?

no shade to lana, but how? again, you need to prove this. how does the lyrical style show her talent? what lyrical devices did she use? what words or lines can be felt strongly by the listener and why? what about storytelling?

Β 

in conclusion, you have a great way with words and it all looks nice. I have zero notes for the language and writing style, A+Β  for that. however, the content is an issue. you need to be so much more specific. provide examples, have clear arguments, go into depth and take us there. your essay is very very general, very subjective, and it doesn't say too much of something specific and it doesn't really help the reader learn something new or make him/her think about the topic

I AM CRYING LAUGHING. ur my new fav user on all of LBΒ 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i think you guys might enjoy this tiktokΒ https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRt1MCrJ/


giphy.gif

Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  "π’Ήπ‘œπ“ƒπ“‰ π’»π‘œπ“‡π‘”π‘’π“‰ 𝓂𝑒, 𝓁𝒾𝓀𝑒 𝓉𝒽𝑒 π“‰π“Šπ“ƒπ“ƒπ‘’π“ π“Šπ“ƒπ’Ήπ‘’π“‡ π‘œπ’Έπ‘’π’Άπ“ƒ 𝒷𝓁𝓋𝒹"

Β  Β instagram

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 111 said:

Y'ALL I'M SCREAMING OMFGGGGGGGGΒ :lmao:the thing i just found out pls i-

OMG WHAT IS IT??? YOU CANNOT DO THIS TO US ITS SO RUDE


giphy.gif

Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  "π’Ήπ‘œπ“ƒπ“‰ π’»π‘œπ“‡π‘”π‘’π“‰ 𝓂𝑒, 𝓁𝒾𝓀𝑒 𝓉𝒽𝑒 π“‰π“Šπ“ƒπ“ƒπ‘’π“ π“Šπ“ƒπ’Ήπ‘’π“‡ π‘œπ’Έπ‘’π’Άπ“ƒ 𝒷𝓁𝓋𝒹"

Β  Β instagram

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...